Sharpe, Sortino & Information Ratios Calculator
Category: Portfolio & PerformanceEvaluate investment performance with key risk-adjusted return metrics. Compare portfolios and investment strategies with measures that account for volatility, downside risk, and benchmark performance.
Investment Data
Benchmark Information (for Information Ratio)
Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics
Statistical Analysis
Ratio Comparison
Return vs. Risk Analysis
Interpretation & Analysis
Your investment shows good risk-adjusted returns with a Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. This indicates that for each unit of risk taken, you're earning an excess return (above risk-free rate) of 1.24.
The Sortino Ratio of 1.85 is notably higher than the Sharpe Ratio, suggesting your investments have relatively lower downside risk compared to overall volatility.
The Information Ratio of 0.76 shows moderate outperformance versus the benchmark, however, this is not statistically significant based on the observation period.
- Strong downside risk management (high Sortino Ratio)
- Consistent performance above the risk-free rate
- Statistically significant Sharpe Ratio
- Benchmark outperformance is not statistically significant
- Moderate maximum drawdown relative to returns
- More data would strengthen the statistical confidence
Understanding Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics
Risk-adjusted return metrics help investors evaluate investment performance while accounting for the risk taken to achieve those returns. These ratios are essential tools for comparing portfolios with different risk profiles.
Sharpe Ratio
Formula: (Average Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Standard Deviation
Developed by Nobel laureate William Sharpe, this ratio measures excess return per unit of total risk. Higher values indicate better risk-adjusted performance.
Sortino Ratio
Formula: (Average Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Downside Deviation
A variant of the Sharpe ratio that only penalizes downside volatility, recognizing that upside volatility is beneficial to investors.
Information Ratio
Formula: (Portfolio Return - Benchmark Return) / Tracking Error
Measures a portfolio manager's ability to generate excess returns relative to a benchmark, but also adjusts for tracking risk (deviation from benchmark).
Statistical Significance
Performance ratios should be tested for statistical significance, especially with shorter observation periods.
For a Sharpe ratio to be statistically significant at the 95% confidence level:
- 1-year observation: Sharpe ratio > 2.0
- 3-year observation: Sharpe ratio > 1.0
- 5-year observation: Sharpe ratio > 0.8
- 10-year observation: Sharpe ratio > 0.6
Similar principles apply to other ratios like the Information Ratio.
Additional Ratios
Treynor Ratio
Formula: (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Portfolio Beta
Measures excess return per unit of systematic risk (beta). A higher Treynor ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted performance against market risk.
Calmar Ratio
Formula: Annualized Return / Maximum Drawdown
Evaluates return relative to maximum drawdown risk. Particularly useful for strategies where limiting large losses is critical.
Sharpe, Sortino, and Beyond: What Your Risk-Adjusted Ratios Reveal
You've just run the numbers—and the results are in. Your portfolio's performance has been broken down using a suite of risk-adjusted return metrics: Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Information Ratio, and possibly Treynor and Calmar if you toggled on the advanced metrics. These figures help paint a clearer picture of how much return you're earning for each unit of risk you're taking.
But seeing the numbers is just the first step. Here's what they really mean for your trading strategy—and where you might want to proceed with confidence or caution.
Signals to Watch in Your ATR Output
The tool evaluated your portfolio's efficiency using volatility, downside risk, and benchmark-relative performance. Below are the key highlights from the output:
- Sharpe Ratio: At 1.24, your return per unit of total volatility is classified as "Good."
- Sortino Ratio: A reading of 1.85 signals stronger performance when only downside risk is considered.
- Information Ratio: Scoring 0.76 against your benchmark shows moderate outperformance—but it's not statistically significant over your selected time frame.
- Treynor Ratio (if available): With a ratio of 13.75 and a beta of 0.85, you're capturing solid returns for each unit of market risk.
- Calmar Ratio (if enabled): A result of 0.52 suggests you're generating modest returns relative to your portfolio’s maximum historical drawdown.
Sharpe Ratio: The Risk Premium Scorecard
The Sharpe Ratio is the workhorse of risk-adjusted metrics—it's a way to standardize returns against the level of volatility taken on. Your Sharpe score of 1.24 implies you're earning 1.24% of excess return (above the risk-free rate) for every 1% of total risk. That's generally considered strong, particularly when it meets the statistical threshold for significance over a 3-year observation period.
- Why it matters: A Sharpe above 1.0 is attractive for multi-asset portfolios and active managers alike.
- Statistical support: Your Sharpe passed the significance test at a 95% confidence level, reinforcing its reliability.
- Tip: If you're optimizing a portfolio, aim for Sharpe levels above 1.0 and ensure a sufficient time horizon (3+ years) to validate performance.
Why Sortino Might Matter More
Unlike Sharpe, the Sortino Ratio doesn’t penalize upside volatility—just downside. That distinction makes it more appealing for traders who care more about avoiding losses than smoothing out gains. Your ratio of 1.85 points to strong protection against downside moves, especially since it’s higher than the Sharpe.
- When to prioritize Sortino: If your strategy involves options, leveraged ETFs, or growth tech where volatility skews upward.
- Implication: Higher Sortino than Sharpe generally signals favorable asymmetry—more positive surprises than negative ones.
- Practical tip: Track Sortino over time to identify deterioration in downside protection during volatile market regimes.
Benchmarking with the Information Ratio
Your Information Ratio sits at 0.76—a middling result, meaning your portfolio slightly outperforms its benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis. However, the lack of statistical significance (p = 0.12) throws a bit of cold water on the enthusiasm.
- Key takeaway: You're outperforming, but not with enough consistency to rule out random chance.
- Improvement angle: Focus on reducing tracking error or increasing alpha relative to your benchmark.
- If you manage a fund: An Information Ratio over 0.8 is generally considered acceptable; over 1.0 is strong.
Additional Metrics: Treynor and Calmar Ratios
If you opted into advanced metrics, the Treynor and Calmar Ratios offer deeper insights:
- Treynor Ratio: At 13.75, you're doing well relative to systematic (market) risk. With a beta below 1.0, this is especially noteworthy.
- Calmar Ratio: A 0.52 suggests your return isn’t significantly higher than your worst-case historical loss. It’s moderate, not alarming—but worth watching.
What to Be Cautious About
Not every number glows green. Here are some areas to monitor:
- Non-significant Information Ratio: A moderate result that lacks statistical backing may not be dependable over time.
- Drawdowns: If your Calmar is low and drawdowns high, your capital preservation needs attention.
- High beta (if applicable): Anything above 1.2 suggests higher market risk, which may explain volatility in returns.
Steps to Sharpen Your Edge
Your output provides valuable signals—but the ratios are only as useful as the action they inspire:
- Consider increasing your observation window to improve significance.
- Benchmark against portfolios with similar volatility profiles.
- Use Sortino when prioritizing downside protection; Sharpe for general portfolio ranking.
- Apply scenario stress testing if Calmar or drawdowns raise red flags.
Next Steps with Your Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Whether you’re tweaking allocations, evaluating a fund manager, or comparing strategies, let these ratios guide—but not dictate—your next trading decision. They’re tools, not gospel.
Now that you’ve got the numbers, use them wisely—and revisit the tool regularly to keep tabs on how your strategy evolves over time.